Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Tue Mar 17th Todays News to be sure

On Bolt Report an ongoing policy is that any Islam post can only be on the pinned leader. Normal rules apply in that if it is merely foul and abusive it will be deleted. Otherwise comments are welcome.  
ABC's Chris Uhlman was touted as being a conservative working for the ABC in WA to then treasurer Peter Costello. Costello said he wasn't doubting the conservative credentials of Uhlman, but it came as no surprise, given the bias of the ABC to the left, that out of some fifty thousand employees, a single conservative might be known by name. Later, after Costello made his observation, it turned out Uhlman was actually a Greens follower, but tried to be balanced in his reporting. Which explains why other ABC employees were so certain he was conservative. But sometimes Uhlman falls far short of the lofty goal of being balanced. As when he promotes Abbott hating memes. One of which was the prejudicial Japanese Submarine deal, accusing Mr Abbott of trying to govern well by favouring a good product. It would not be good for Mr Abbott to break the tender process, and he hasn't. But one would not know listening to Uhlman's gossip. That is only one example of Uhlman's glaring failure to be balanced. Some idiots might say that Uhlman has said good things about Mr Abbott in the past, and so saying wrong things now is balancing. 

Blogger Tim Blair posted a joke about the name of an ISIL terrorist, actually the joke was their name, and a journalist in UK mistakes it for failed news copy. And twitter goes berserk without anyone noting it was a deliberate joke for a blogger. Tim had written an opinion piece. Tim is a journalist who writes excellent articles, when he writes them, too. But the standard of news papers like Fairfax, ABC or Guardian is so low that none of them researched their vapid comments. Saliently, SMH threw a party in Sydney's Domain Park, and nobody came. 

ALP, keen not to be under performed by their news wings, sent out Plibersek to entangle Mr Abbott over the executions of two of the Bali Nine. She back tracked after being challenged for the faux pas of politicising the coming event. 
There is something particularly Irish about celebrating St Patrick's Day on the anniversary of the day he died. His legacy to Ireland is Christian. He is credited with killing all the snakes in Ireland. One fact is there are no snakes in Ireland, outside of a zoo. Another fact is that there never have been snakes in Ireland. Possibly there were snake cults in Ireland which St Patrick defeated, but why spoil a good tale? Ireland is well known as Catholic, but St Patrick wasn't Roman Catholic and neither was Ireland until Henry Viii broke free from Rome and established the Anglican Church. But the truth is Ireland, like her women, is gorgeous. She sings a beautiful, haunting song. 

Today is also the anniversary (180 AD) of the death of stoic Roman Emperor, last of the five good ones, Marcus Aurelius. But, on 455 AD, and on a happy thought for Harry Potter fans, Petronius Maximus got the support of the Roman Senate to become emperor of the Western Roman Empire. His happy thought ended prematurely two and a half months later when Rome was sacked by Vandals. A salient lesson for any who govern on happy thoughts. In 1780, Washington gave his men a holiday in support of the Irish. Proving for all time happy thoughts can be effective. On this day in 1805, Napoleon tired of being the President of the republic of Italy, and became king of the kingdom of Italy.
Historical perspectives on this day 
Technical issues prevent todays listing
This column welcomes feedback and criticism. The column is not made up but based on the days events and articles which are then placed in the feed. So they may not have an apparent cohesion they would have had were they made up.
Editorials will appear in the "History in a Year by the Conservative Voice" series, starting with August https://www.createspace.com/4124406September https://www.createspace.com/5106914October https://www.createspace.com/5106951, or at Amazon http://www.amazon.com/dp/1482020262/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_dVHPub0MQKDZ4  The kindle version is cheaper, but the soft back version allows the purchase of a kindle version for just $3.99 more. 
For twenty two years I have been responsibly addressing an issue, and I cannot carry on. I am petitioning the Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott to remedy my distress. I leave it up to him if he chooses to address the issue. Regardless of your opinion of conservative government, the issue is pressing. Please sign my petition at https://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/tony-abbott-remedy-the-persecution-of-dd-ball

Or the US President at
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/change-injustice-faced-david-daniel-ball-after-he-reported-bungled-pedophile-investigation-and/b8mxPWtJ or http://wh.gov/ilXYR

Mr Ball, I will not sign your petition as it will do no good, but I will share your message and ask as many of friends who read it, to share it also. Let us see if we cannot use the power of the internet to spread the word of these infamous killings. As a father and a former soldier, I cannot, could not, justify ignoring this appalling action by the perpetrators, whoever they may; I thank you Douglas. You are wrong about the petition. Signing it is as worthless and meaningless an act as voting. A stand up guy would know that. - ed

Lorraine Allen Hider I signed the petition ages ago David, with pleasure, nobody knows what it's like until they've been there. Keep heart David take care.

I have begun a bulletin board (http://theconservativevoice.freeforums.netwhich will allow greater latitude for members to post and interact. It is not subject to FB policy and so greater range is allowed in posts. Also there are private members rooms in which nothing is censored, except abuse. All welcome, registration is free.

Happy birthday and many happy returns Phuc Le, Belinda Lui and Joseph Hieu Dinh. Born on St Patrick's day, and so bearing the gift that each US Dollar note you touch is green. Remember that.
Richard Ramirez
Avoid the duck of death. After the conquest comes the reconquest. The siege is over. It is set in ice. The night stalker is caught. Let's party. 


Tim Blair – Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (6:14am)

The ongoing Furkan Derya Twitterstorm began with a literal case of missing the big picture. BBC journalist Phil Mackie kicked things off after receiving an email from Sydney containing an abbreviated snap of Monday’s column:


That email included a description of the column as a straightforward news item. Believing this, Mackie suggested my furkan joke may not have been intended for publication:


Another British journalist, Callum May, thereafter decided I’d made a terrible mistake: 
Don’t write stuff in copy you don’t want printed. Massive howler … 
And then Fairfax-trained SBS reporter Stephanie Anderson – apparently still relying on Mackie’s clip rather than the actual column – got involved: 
Well, someone at the @dailytelegraph is in trouble this morning... 
At which point Twitter lost it. So did a number of non-Twitter sources
He probably meant the joke to be caught by his editor. 
No. I meant it to be published by my editor. That’s why I wrote it. The AFR’s Joe Aston found himself swayed by Twitter opinion: 
There must have been a Tele subeditor in the naughty corner at Holt Street. 
Wrong, Joe. Entertainment.ie
A lesson: Never write anything in a story, even for a millisecond as a joke, that you don’t want to go in the paper. 
Again, no. It was meant to go in the paper, which is why it went in the paper. The Independent
This newspaper column illustrates just how important sub-editors are, and how badly wrong things can go when they seemingly abandon their posts … 
They didn’t. The Daily Edge dismissed my follow-up piece
According to Blair himself, the sentence was meant to be there as a little joke … Right. Sure. OK. We believe you, buddy. 
Kids, the sentence was also posted right here on my website. Evidently nobody knows how to run a simple Google search these days. Back on Twitter, observe the crestfallen reactions as various shamers gradually become aware of their awareness gaps.
In the end it was all just a major misunderstanding. For an excellent summary, I furkan derya to click on this from Buzzfeed‘s Patrick Smith.


Tim Blair – Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (3:14am)

Fairfax threw a party but nobody came
The first weekend of Fairfax Media’s major new events division project, the Spectrum Now festival, has seen a disastrously low public turnout. 
The free Spectrum Playground event in Sydney’s Domain saw just a few hundred people attend over the weekend at a venue which has a capacity of tens of thousands. 
Please click and scroll to observe a completely ignored Sydney Morning Herald stand. Why did this stupid, shrinking company try to throw a massive public party in the first place? 
Fairfax has signalled that it sees a significant part of its future business model based on building mass public events. 
Good start.


Tim Blair – Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (2:45am)

The ABC reports: 
Members of Sydney’s Muslim community have set up a $1 million television studio to counter the mainstream media’s treatment of Islam in Australia.
From its base in western Sydney, the One Path Network films and edits videos for its YouTube channel, including interviews with local sheikhs about Islamic teachings and current affairs.
“This is a time where there is a lot of pressure on the Muslim community,” the head of the network, Malaz Majanni, said. 
Sounds just great. So what sort of content might viewers expect? 
The network has provided its own take on major events including the Sydney siege.
“Our approach was to make sure that it’s clear that this act is not an Islamic act,” Mr Majanni said. 
So … it’s just another version of the ABC.
(Via J.F. Beck)


Tim Blair – Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (2:22am)

Subtract Jeremy Clarkson from the BBC and this is the result
The BBC’s decision to suspend Jeremy Clarkson and pull the three remaining episodes of Top Gear cost BBC2 nearly 4 million viewers on Sunday night. 
That’s a lot of viewers – and future revenue – to throw away.
(Via bingbing) 

Unions NSW hijack Anzac Day

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (2:48pm)

How low can Unions NSW go in its election campaign? First we’ve had the outright lies in its propaganda against the leasing of the state’s poles and wires.
Now it’s exploiting Anzac Day with a float at a festival sponsored by the RSL to honor our diggers:
Penrith Valley Community Unions to [will] remember historic first ANZAC parade with Penrith Festival Float.

This year’s Penrith Festival is commemorating the 100th anniversary of the landings at Gallipoli but it will also be focusing on key issues ahead of the State election.

Penrith Valley Community Unions are concerned about the impact the Baird Government’s policies are having on working families in Western Sydney.  The Liberals push to privatise the electricity system has become a key issue in the NSW election with polling clearly showing voters don’t like pubic assets being sold off.

And young apprentices have discovered that they are being slugged thousands of dollars extra in fees to attend TAFE courses in order to complete their trade training…

PVCU Secretary, Mary Court stated: “Unions stood behind our wounded soldiers coming back from war a century ago and we are also ready to stand up for the rights of working people today.”

Mrs Court said the Trade Union movement organised the first ANZAC parade as a fundraiser to help wounded soldiers in 1915.  The PVCU float in this year’s parade will be commemorating that commitment to our diggers.  

IPCC vultures rush to feed on Cyclone Pam

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (1:38pm)

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is shameless in exploiting natural disasters to peddle its warmist faith.
Its last big report admitted there was actually no evidence yet of cyclones getting worse or more common. If anything, the opposite:
In summary, confidence in large scale changes in the intensity of extreme extratropical cyclones since 1900 is low…
Over periods of a century or more, evidence suggests slight decreases in the frequency of tropical cyclones making landfall in the North Atlantic and the South Pacific, once uncertainties in observing methods have been considered. Little evidence exists of any longer-term trend in other ocean basins… Several studies suggest an increase in intensity, but data sampling issues hamper these assessments…
Callaghan and Power (2011) find a statistically significant decrease in Eastern Australia land-falling tropical cyclones since the late 19th century although including 2010/2011 season data this trend becomes non-significant (i.e., a trend of zero lies just inside the 90% confidence interval).
But when Cyclone Pam hits Vanuatu, the IPCC cannot resist hyping it as part of a trend that it has already admitted does not actually exist:
STATEMENT / 16. MAR, 2015:

Cyclone Pam, the extreme storm which devastated Vanuatu this weekend, has put the spotlight firmly on climate risk and global disaster management, leading to calls by high-ranking UN officials and political leaders to draw the necessary conclusions and step up climate action and efforts to build greater resilience to disasters.
Utterly shameless. Oh, and the planet’s atmosphere has not actually warmed for some 17 years.
Greens leader Christine Milne also exploits a tragedy - and ignores the science - to promote her apocalyptic faith:
Just what difference Australia could actually make to cyclone intensity is something Milne won’t explain - and can’t.
Reader Steve reminds the vultures:
On Christmas Eve 1951 a storm killed 100 people on Vanuatu.

And this report from the Vanuatu Meteorlogical Service lists severe cyclones in: 1848, 1852, 1873, 1874, 1880, 1893, 1916, 1918 and 1940.
Vanuatu averages two cyclones a year.
(Thanks to reader Mark M.) 

Malcolm Turnbull picks a side

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (12:33pm)

Notice how Channel Seven and Nine skew their news a little to the Left? Think Seven’s Mark Reilly, Andrew O’Keefe and David Koch. Think Nine’s Laurie Oakes and 60 Minutes.
Notice how Sky News, on Foxtel, is closer to balanced?
Notice how Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull proposes media changes that will help the former and hurt Foxtel, part owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation?
Terry McCrann:
Turnbull has now proposed three “reforms”, which would once again favour the [free-to-air]-TV networks. 
TO abolish the rule which limits a network’s reach to 75 per cent of the population — in practical terms Melbourne-Sydney plus either Perth or Brisbane.
TO abolish the rule limiting a single company’s ownership (or control) to two out of three of FTA-TV, print and radio in any location.
TO require Foxtel to pay the FTA-TV networks a fee to retransmit their signal.
All of these, considered on their own, make good sense — although different media companies have supported (and opposed) different elements on the basis of their own narrow interest.
Each can be considered exercises in genuine deregulation. The “but” is that Turnbull proposes to leave untouched the key rule which fundamentally handicaps Foxtel’s ability to compete with the FTA-TV networks for eyeballs: the anti-siphoning rules which reserve so much of sport for FTA-TV.
By excluding some form of reform — which could stop way short of total abolition — of the anti-siphoning, Turnbull turns those “reforms” into a package which would act as the very opposite of that. The anti-siphoning imposes critical negatives on Foxtel.
It limits its ability to get programming in its own right to build eyeballs; and it forces Foxtel to pay what is effectively a tax to one or more of the FTA-TV networks to get secondary access to programming. 

The Left now sounds just like the Islamist Right

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (11:21am)

One of the most disturbing developments in public debates has been the Left giving cover to Islamists of the far Right.
Isi Leibler, former head of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and chairman of the World Jewish Congress, called it out during a discussion with me last month:
In a sense, I think, anti-Semitism in Europe today is worse than it was before the Holocaust. Worse in the sense that at least at that time there were some people standing up on the Left or whatever. Liberals were defending Jews. Today Jews are on their own…
The Left is leading the charge against Zionism which is another form of anti-Semitism because they are not being critical of Zionism or Israel. They are simply using the Jewish state in lieu of attacking Jews individually and this kind of anti-Semitism has become part and parcel of the DNA of the Left. Combine that with Islamic fundamentalists and it’s a pretty awful concoction.
Here is another example of how some prominent Leftists in Australia now sound almost indistinguishable from the Islamic far Right, giving a dangerous licence to their hatred.
From the Left, “civil libertarian” Julian Burnside:
Sorry to see Andrew Bolt stirring up Islamophobia today on his blog. People like Bolt and Abbott are the real threat to our way of life.
From the far Right of Islam:
LINDT cafe terrorist Man Haron Monis was last year given front-row treatment by the radical Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir at a presentation in their Lakemba headquarters…
At the talk Monis heard the two most outspoken members of the Australian branch of Hizb ut-Tahrir — [Uthman] Badar and [Wassim] Doureihi — rail against the government, the West and the media amid chants of “Allahu Akhbar”.
Badar ... and Doureihi described Daily Telegraph columnist Andrew Bolt and Radio 2GB presenter Ben Fordham as “right-wing bigots” and praised the value of “confrontation” with non-Muslims.

I know three Australian journalists already have been the subject of death threats from Islamists. Jews here also live in increasing fear.
Burnside is playing a very, very dangerous game.
Just in case you were inclined to believe the “Islam means peace” slogan of the Left, a small corrective, broadcast on a new Muslim TV station in Australia:
JASON OM: OnePath also has no problem airing more controversial views, including from the political group Hizb ut-Tahrir.
UTHMAN BADAR, HIZB UT-TAHRIR: We are not pacifists, we’re Muslims, and as all Muslims know, there is a place for violence in Islam, there is a place for war in Islam, with its conditions and qualifications.
Former Treasurer Peter Costello on where the Left intersects with the Islamic Right - criticising Western society without mercy or proportion:
A big difference between our society and an Islamist one is the capacity for self-doubt and open criticism. We believe that doubting something and subjecting it to scrutiny is the best way to get to the truth. That is the scientific method. Some alienated young people might misunderstand that diet of critical analysis as evidence of a weak and corrupt society compared with their idealised “pure” religious society that brooks no criticism and has all the answers.
We cannot feed the young on criticism alone. Australia is one of the most successful, open, prosperous, accepting societies that the world has ever known. Being born here is one of the best things that could ever happen in a person’s life. That is worth explaining as part of immunising the young against the false political claims of extremists.

The West, slouching to Mecca

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (10:56am)

Can we survive as a civilisation without a faith to unite us? To guide us?  And with Christianity dying of indifference and embarrassment, is the West helpless against the claims of Islam for respect, converts and submission to a grand order?
Look at the bitter fruits of the hyper-freedoms we’ve granted ourselves after destroying our own faith and tradition. Can this dysfunction and rootlessness really resist Islam?
Mark Lilla reviews Soumission, an important new novel by Michel Houellebecq, who seemingly writes in praise of Islam - thus, hopefully, avoiding more attempts to sue him for blasphemy under France’s obscene laws. The key extracts of a fine essay you should read in full:
The best-selling novel in Europe today, Michel Houellebecq’s Soumission, is about an Islamic political party coming peacefully to power in France…
Soumission is not the story some expected of a coup d’état, and no one in it expresses hatred or even contempt of Muslims. It is about a man and a country who through indifference and exhaustion find themselves slouching toward Mecca… All one hears at the end is a bone-chilling sigh of collective relief. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come. Whatever.
François, the main character of Soumission, is a mid-level literature professor at the Sorbonne… François is shipwrecked in the present. He doesn’t understand why his students are so eager to get rich, or why journalists and politicians are so hollow, or why everyone, like him, is so alone. He believes that “only literature can give you that sensation of contact with another human spirit,” but no one else cares about it. His sometime girlfriend Myriam genuinely loves him but he can’t respond, and when she leaves to join her parents, who have emigrated to Israel because they feel unsafe in France, all he can think to say is: “There is no Israel for me.” Prostitutes, even when the sex is great, only deepen the hole he is in…
The wild card in all this is a new, moderate Muslim party (the Muslim Brotherhood) that by now attracts about a fifth of the electorate, about as many as the Socialists do. The party’s founder and president, Mohammed Ben Abbes—a cross between Tariq Ramadan and Recep Tayyip Erdo?an before he took power—is a genial man who gets along well with Catholic and Jewish community leaders who share his conservative social views, and also with business types who like his advocacy of economic growth. Foreign heads of state, beginning with the pope, have given him their blessing…
As expected, [the far-Right] Le Pen wins the presidential primary but the Socialists and the conservative UMP don’t have enough votes between them to defeat her. So they decide to back Ben Abbes in the runoff, and by a small margin France elects its first Muslim president. Ben Abbes decides to let the other parties divide up the ministries, reserving for the Muslim Brotherhood only the education portfolio. He, unlike his coalition partners, understands that a nation’s destiny depends on how well it teaches young people fundamental values and enriches their inner lives…
Except in the schools, very little seems to happen at first. But over the next months François begins to notice small things, beginning with how women dress. Though the government has established no dress code, he sees fewer skirts and dresses on the street, more baggy pants and shirts that hide the body’s contours. It seems that non-Muslim women have spontaneously adopted the style to escape the sexual marketplace that Houellebecq describes so chillingly in his other novels. Youth crime declines, as does unemployment when women, grateful for new family subsidies, begin to leave the workforce to care for their children.
François thinks he sees a new social model developing before his eyes, inspired by a religion he knows little about, and which he imagines has the polygamous family at its center. 

Icon Arrow Continue reading 'The West, slouching to Mecca'

The Fairfax agenda is plain, but its audience is small

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (10:40am)

Some Liberal MPs get spooked by the Fairfax coverage, amplified by Twitter, of what is made to seem their unending litany of failures and gaffes.
Indeed, today’s website of the Sydney Morning Herald would have you think the Abbott Government has had another catastrophic day:
Two things need to be remembered to put this extraordinary hate campaign in context.
First, the two stories attacking Hockey, based only on a smartarse insult from ABC Leftist host Tony Jones and comments from the head of a Leftist think tank, are not just examples of the Left merely reinforcing the Left. They also part of an astonishing - and astonishingly juvenile - campaign to denigrate the Government, and must be seen in the context of this vow from the SMH editor-in-chief, exposed in Hockey’s defamation case against the paper:
Text messages read in court show Mr Goodsir told Mr Holden and other senior journalists at 6.35am the same morning that Mr Hockey’s office had “a f***ing hide” waking him in the middle of the night [to demand an apology for a clear error]…
The editor-in-chief of the Sydney Morning Herald ... was quizzed on a series of emails in which he openly declared he “dreamed” of a headline attacking the treasurer.
In an email with senior journalists and Age editor-in-chief Andrew Holden, [Darren] Goodsir wrote: “Given what Andrew (Holden) and I endured last week with Hockey, I want to have this nailed to the cross in more ways than one....
“I have long dreamed (well, actually only since last Friday), of a headline that screams: Sloppy Joe! I think we are not far off, but perhaps even more serious than that."…
Second, the Sydney Morning Herald’s readership is increasingly on-line. These are readers generally of the Left simply wanting to have their worst prejudices against the Government reinforced, which is why so many Herald stories on line attacking the Government generally and Tony Abbott very personally read like click-bait.
These stories then get a new life on Twitter - a medium dominated by the same demographic - to fool some Liberals into thinking they’re hearing the voice of millions of scornful critics. How can they win against this army?
But what army?
Here is what that Fairfax army looks like when the paper asks it to emerge from the dark and assemble in the open at a festival of free music:

The first weekend of Fairfax Media’s major new events division project, the Spectrum Now festival, has seen a disastrously low public turnout.

The free Spectrum Playground event in Sydney’s Domain saw just a few hundred people attend over the weekend at a venue which has a capacity of tens of thousands…
Fairfax has signalled that it sees a significant part of its future business model based on building mass public events.
The Fairfax hatred of the Government is part of a discreditable agenda, and the audience for it is smaller than you’d think.
So take heart and fight back. Readers should, too.
(Via Tim Blair.)
Reader Notch:
The funniest part of Fairfax’s story was the supposed drubbing that an economist gave Hockey on a question relating to negative gearing.
When asked why he hadn’t abolished negative gearing, Hockey said that rents had subsequently risen when Hawke had done it in the 80’s. Fairfax then says the economist “set him straight” by saying:

It was absolutely true that rents went up fast in Sydney...barely moved in Brisbane, didn’t go up very far in Melbourne, didn’t go up very far in Adelaide. They did go up very fast in Perth…
They all rose.So the economist “set him straight” by agreeing that rents had gone up in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth?
He fundamentally agreed with what Hockey had said, that rents had risen, and Fairfax thinks that’s a gotcha?

Why are these politicians protecting this union?

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (10:24am)

Why are so many politicians - Labor, the Greens and some independents - protecting this lawless union at such cost to the rest of us?:
A building contractor targeted by the militant construction union after he refused to give in to high pay demands has pleaded for the return of the Australian Building and Construction Commission.
In a rare show of public defiance by the construction industry to the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, BKH Group general manager Dermot O’Sullivan said union members blockaded access to a building site near Sydney Airport on Monday by chaining and padlocking the entry gates to punish the company…

Fair Work Building and Construction director Nigel Hadgkiss said last night that four agency inspectors visited the construction site at Discovery Point Wolli Creek, in Southern Sydney on Monday, in response to the alleged blockade.
“The investigators received a hostile reception, including a female investigator being spat at by a male individual,” he said.
“This is the same female investigator who was called an f---ing s--t at a construction site at Barangaroo last year ... “
Mr O’Sullivan said the company had been in lengthy negotiations with the CFMEU for a new workplace agreement and decided to pursue an agreement directly with its employees because the union would not budge from its demands.
He said the company had agreed to annual pay rises of 5 per cent for employees but could not accept a union demand for a $3.65 hourly site allowance, which he said would cost BKH an extra $5 million to $6.5 million a year.
“We would go belly up and go broke,” he said.
Mr O’Sullivan said a meeting of workers had rejected the union proposal…
Mr O’Sullivan accused union officials of deliberately disrupting a concrete pour at one of the company’s projects last week… Mr O’Sullivan accused the union of “operating outside the law” and said it’s “absolutely disgraceful conduct” was why Senate crossbenchers should reverse their opposition to the reinstatement of the ABCC.
Three crossbenchers intend to side with Labor and the Greens to defeat the ABCC bill when a vote is held in the next two weeks… Jacqui Lambie, John Madigan and Ricky Muir said they would join Labor and the Greens to vote down the ABCC bill.
Defeat of the bill would cast doubt over the government’s new construction code as well as the compulsory powers used by the FWBC to target the CFMEU.
(Thanks to reader Peter of Bellevue Hill.) 

Covering up for Plibersek’s smear

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (8:56am)

Tanya Plibersek cannot even be honest about her disgusting and deeply deceptive attempt to blame Tony Abbott’s boat policies for Indonesia’s refusal to discuss clemency for Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran.
What Plibersek had said, referring to President Joko Widodo not returning Abbott’s latest call asking for clemency
We certainly have been opposed to turnbacks. Tony Abbott can’t get a phone call returned from the Indonesian president – it has affected our relationship with Indonesia in the past. It has not been good for it.
What her spokesman now claims Plibersek said:
A spokesman for Plibersek said that her statements “were in relation to a different matter” and not in relation to Chan and Sukumaran.
“Labor doesn’t play politics with this highly sensitive matter – it’s too important,” the spokesman said. 
The media pack, so swift to attack Abbott for everything from winking to eating an onion, shows zero interest in holding Plibersek to account for this foul smear.
Number of questions asked about Plibersek at Bill Shorten’s two media conferences yesterday: zero.
That’s even though everything Plibersek suggested in linking the boat people policy to Widodo’s silence was false.
Foreign Minister Julie Bishop hints that if there is any link between political decisions here and Widodo’s alleged anger there (which seems unlikely), Plibersek should check a mirror:
“She tied the issue of border protection in with the execution of two Australian citizens and that was a very crude and ill-informed statement to make,” Bishop told ABC radio.
“We inherited from Labor the live cattle ban, the Snowden allegations, and the fact that through the change of Labor policies on border protection Indonesia once more found itself a destination point for a number of people seeking to come to Australia through the people-smuggling trade,” she said. “And we’ve had to deal with all of those issues one by one, and we do it quietly and methodically and respectfully.”
Chris Kenny:
TANYA Plibersek’s wrongheaded and misguided comments about the Indonesian relationship [on Sunday] constituted a sad and deplorable descent into partisan politicking where there should be none…
Everything about her statement was erroneous but the most loathsome aspect was Ms Plibersek’s unprompted attempt to tie in the fate of two Australians facing execution to her partisan attack…
Her comments can only be interpreted as an accusation that Mr Abbott’s border protection policies have damaged relations with Jakarta and that this has jeopardised the mercy effort..
This is plumbing new depths in political discourse…
Besides, it is a simple fact that this crucial relationship has been substantially repaired since enormous damage was done under Labor.
Julia Gillard’s unilateral 2010 thought-bubble about an “East Timor solution” on asylum-seekers was a slap in the face to Jakarta and was followed up with the disastrous decision — again without consulting Indonesia — to axe the live cattle trade…
(T)he worst crisis in the relationship under the Abbott government came with revelations that Australia had been spying on Jakarta’s inner circle; under the Rudd Labor government....
It is astonishing that Ms Plibersek has not been called out by commentators for this deliberate and damaging distortion.
Not only did journalists fail to ask Shorten a single question about Plibersek yesterday, the ABC’s Michael Brissenden on AM yesterday tried to argue Plibersek’s case:
MICHAEL BRISSENDEN: Can we turn to the Bali Nine. Still no phone call from the Indonesian leader to Tony Abbott. [On Sunday] Tanya Plibersek, the shadow foreign minister, said the fact that Tony Abbott couldn’t get a call back showed the relationship wasn’t good generally. Do you accept that?
JULIE BISHOP: Not at all. That is a very crude and ill-informed assessment of our relationship with Indonesia and shows an appalling lack of understanding…
MICHAEL BRISSENDEN: The relationship’s not always good though, is it? I mean you can’t, I mean it is rocky. It goes up and down and goes through troughs occasionally.
JULIE BISHOP: There have been, there have been times of challenges and…
JULIE BISHOP: … disagreements but it’s ...
MICHAEL BRISSENDEN: And Tanya Plibersek yesterday mentioned boat tow-backs for instance.
JULIE BISHOP: Well, she tied the issue of border protection in with the …
MICHAEL BRISSENDEN: That has been a sore point, to be fair ...

(Thanks to reader Peter of Bellevue Hill.) 

Furkan Derya not to laugh

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (6:50am)

Twitter confirms Leftist prejudices and reinforces ignorance.  The puritan state-sponsored Left is also completely thrown by irony and parody.
Add the two and you get explosions of ill-informed sanctimony.
The latest example: Tim Blair mentions Furkan Derya and the Twitterati howls at what it assumes is a howler.

Another lifestyle choice you pay for

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (5:43am)

More lifestyle choices subsidised by taxpayers: three generations of women on the dole, at least two of whom are single or unmarried mums. 

Aboriginal spokesman agrees: it’s a “lifestyle choice”. So where’s the outrage?

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (12:59am)

Bella Bropho, spokesperson for the Swan Valley Nyungah Community, uses exactly the same language about an Aboriginal camp that had Tony Abbott damned by Aboriginal leaders and smeared as a racist by the Greens:
People choose to live that lifestyle. I mean, they’ve been living it for thousands of years.

(Thanks to reader Richard.) 

The incredibly vanishing Palmer dream

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (12:59am)

Clive Palmer in June 2013:
TONY JONES:  Hedley Thomas, ‘The Australian’s reporter, has ... raised questions over the financial viability of two of your key companies, the nickel refinery in Townsville is one of them and of course your resort hotel in Coolum. Are they both making big losses as is claimed?
CLIVE PALMER: No, they’re on track at the moment with the investment we’ve got, that I’m putting in of my money and the results are better than projected. If you take the resort at Coolum, when we took it over it had a total of $509 million of losses since it opened and the owner was going to close it down and cut it up for real estate. We stepped in, restructured it, we had to change some jobs and let some people go and put some other people on, and now it’s operating ...
Clive Palmer in October 2013:
LEIGH SALES: Let me also ask you: does your Coolum resort in Queensland operate at a profit?
CLIVE PALMER:: No, it’s where I live and where I enjoy myself and that’s - I keep people employed at a great subsidy ‘cause I love the Sunshine Coast and I love spending my money to keep people employed in the greatest state in Australia.
LEIGH SALES: And how long are you prepared to sustain that loss?
CLIVE PALMER: Well probably until I die.
Clive Palmer now:
IT is the demise of a dinosaur park that long-suffering staff and rare paying guests have been predicting since soon after Clive Palmer first put his indelible brand on a resort once regarded as the finest on the Sunshine Coast. 

Its close yesterday — and the sacking of another 40 full-time staff at the Palmer Coolum Resort that employed more than 650 people before Mr Palmer bought his favourite holiday destination four years ago and promised growth — was inevitable as its appeal waned and ­financial losses mounted…
Total operating costs, including salaries, insurance fees, rates, utilities and maintenance were almost $20 million a year, which meant the resort needed its rooms, restaurants and golf course to be busy every day, say insiders.
The revenue and guest-stay numbers worsened every month and the losses could not be reversed… In January, which should have been a bumper month, the resort recorded a loss of about $500,000, and this was “a good result compared with most months”, according to staff… The golf course will stay open, but the rooms and most of the restaurants are now out of commission. 

Hating Abbott to death

Andrew Bolt March 17 2015 (12:15am)

How the Left hates

The viciousness of the Fairfax Abbott haters, evidenced by this Age headline (since changed):
Disgusting. In fact, the wild rumors peddled by The Age link Abbott’s unpopularity not to the executions but their delay, as the subheading and the copy suggest:
Elnino Husein Mohi, a parliamentarian from the same party as defeated presidential candidate Prabowo Subianto, said the government would lose the trust of the people if the executions continued to be delayed.
He said it was legitimate for people to ask the president and vice-president whether the executions would be delayed until Mr Abbott’s domestic popularity improved.
The ABC’s Chris Uhlmann, one of the ABC’s best and fairest, got caught up in the get-Abbott hysteria two weeks ago on Insiders, now undeniably partisan:
Chris Uhlmann: There’s a lot of wild rumours going around but Four Corners have been wandering the building, that’s Parliament House, for the last couple of weeks. Now there’s a lot of speculation about what they have. And one of the things that people do believe they have is some documents which show that there was a deal with the Japanese submarines. Now I don’t know whether they do or don’t. All I’m saying, that’s one of the rumours that are going around. People believe that [the Four Corners] program will go to air on Monday the 23rd, which is the Monday before the NSW election, [in] which case you’d have three of four days of that kind of chaos again. Remember Prince Philip in the lead-up to the Queensland election. So they’re the calculations that people are making, rightly or wrongly.
Dennis Atkins: Are you sure that’s not just insider ABC gossip?
Chris Uhlmann: Look, I can honestly say I have not been in touch with Four Corners. I support Four Corners but I don’t know what they’re up to, either.
Tonight the ABC’s Four Corners tried to beat that failed challenge to Tony Abbott back into life. Old grievances were once again aired, but nothing new was added. indeed, two former Abbott critics in the party now backed him. And, needless to say, there was no document showing Abbott had made a secret deal with Japan.
As I said two weeks ago:
Chris Uhlmann ...  concedes he does not know if this [rumor] is actually true and did not contact his Four Corners colleagues to even find out. He did not add that the Government denies any deal.
This is no longer even close to reporting or analysing. This is a witchhunt with not the slightest attempt at balance. And it is journalists doing their damnedest to make their predictions of Abbott’s fall - so often thwarted - come true.
And the ABC can’t stop trying to keep that witchhunt going.
(Via Paul Murray.) 





=== Posts from last year ===


Tim Blair – Monday, March 17, 2014 (1:57pm)

Scroll through these shots from Canberra’s March in March. The 15th image is particularly cute:



Tim Blair – Monday, March 17, 2014 (5:24am)

Small pods of malcontents took to the streets over the weekend in some kind of protest against Tony Abbott.


The precise complaints of these people were difficult to identify, however.



Tim Blair – Monday, March 17, 2014 (3:33am)

Back in 2008, the ABC took great delight in describing the Liberal party’s powerlessness. The previous year’s federal election installed Labor’s Kevin Rudd as Prime Minister, adding him to Labor leaders in every state and territory.
So who, during those wall-to-wall Labor days, was Australia’s leading conservative office-holder? As a happy Kerry O’Brien reported: “He may be just the Lord Mayor of Brisbane, but Campbell Newman is now the Liberal flag bearer.” Newman joined in the ABC’s fun, even accepting a ceremonial Wallabies jersey from the Chaser team, who urged him to wear it during Howard-style morning walks. “It just shows that someone cares,” said the then-Lord Mayor.
Six years on, the political map is a little different and the ABC’s smiles have vanished. Following the weekend’s elections in Tasmania and South Australia, Labor may now be left with only South Australia – or possibly not, depending on how postal votes fall and the role of two independents.

Icon Arrow Continue reading 'LABOR RULES LAKE MACQUARIE'

Report: ABC’s Q&A to “clarify” those outrageous falsehoods

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (3:59pm)

Culture wars


Apparently Q&A will issue a “clarification” of the false and defamatory claims it broadcast last week about me, falsely portraying me as a racist who’d subjected a woman identifying as Aboriginal to “foul abuse”.
Well, let’s see what it does now that even Langton has apologised for these outrageous falsehoods.  My bet? It will be a clarification of a yes-but kind that will in some way get even with me for my effrontery in making it concede it had gone too far.
I understand Media Watch is preparing just such an item in what seems to me a possibly unconscious but certainly concerted attempt to vilify a conservative critic.
Forgive me if I’ve misjudged it. But give me reasons to trust its good faith. 

The Left still marching through the institutions it’s trashed

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (12:51pm)

The Left are brilliant at stacking the cultural institutions. Two examples from the past week:

The taxpayer-funded Grattan Institute appoints the ABC’s Left-leaning Geraldine Doogue:
Grattan Institute is delighted to announce that ABC presenter, Geraldine Doogue, has joined the Grattan Board. 
Ms Doogue, whose 40-year journalism career features numerous roles and awards, presents Saturday Extra on Radio National and Compass on ABC TV1.
The RMIT’s journalism school appoints the Left-leaning Morry Schwartz:
Publisher and media philanthropist Morry Schwartz has been appointed Adjunct Professor (Journalism) at RMIT University… 
He is the director of BlackInc Books and the publisher of the Quarterly Essay and The Monthly. In a bold move, he also recently launched a new weekly newspaper The Saturday Paper. 

ABC markets March in March, presenting only its good side

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (9:49am)


The ABC generously publishes 43 pictures of yesterday’s anti-Abbott “March in March” protest to publicise the cause.
Not one of the pictures includes the many vile, offensive, vicious or threatening signs or the F… Abbott T-shirts, which is odd. When an anti-Gillard rally was held in Canberra, ABC reports tended to show just one picture of the protesters signs, and focused on the most abusive and discreditable, which some clown put up behind Abbott without him noticing.
Biased much?
(Via Tom Murphy and with thanks to reader Peter of Bellevue Hill.)
A sign the ABC promoted:
A sign - and sign of hypocrisy - the ABC ignored:
A protester the ABC promoted:
A protester the ABC ignored:
Meet the barbarian carrying the “KillAbbott” sign.
(Thanks to reader Peter H.) 

Is Mark Dreyfus a liar or just a fool?

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (9:47am)

Mark Dreyfus is either lying or recklessly ill-informed about my court case. Either way he is not fit to be Labor’s shadow attorney-general:
DREYFUS: On one case, which people have repeatedly misquoted. People have repeatedly ignored what happened in this case, which is that a tabloid columnist deliberately used false information to vilify the complainants in the case. He had been told by them that what he had written on an earlier occasion was false and he deliberately repeated it.
This, too, is completely false:
Now that’s a very extreme case and the Bolt case wasn’t really fought on racial vilification matters. It was actually fought on whether or not he was entitled to the protection of the free speech defence that’s in the legislation and the court found that he wasn’t.
If I didn’t make it a point of pride to never sue, Dreyfus would be at severe risk of a defamation action. What he says is completely false.
Fact: I fought and still fight any suggestion that I was racially vilifying anyone. Fact: I did not deliberately write anything false, and was certainly never told beforehand what I wrote was false. Indeed, I disputed some of what were said to be “errors”.  Dreyfus is simply spreading an untruth to discredit me and thus deny the Racial Discrimination Act needs reform.
Shame on this man. He is free to argue for this restriction on free speech, but he is not entitled to spread falsehoods and smears to argue his point. That is the action of a very little man.

A warning to Dreyfus: you have now been told that what you had said is false. If you deliberately repeat this defamation we will know you for a liar.

Malaysian pilot now suspected

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (8:56am)

Suspicions now rest on the pilot:
An image has emerged of the pilot of the missing Malaysia Airlines jet wearing a T-shirt with a ‘Democracy is Dead’ slogan as it has been revealed he could have hijacked the plane in an anti-government protest. 
Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a father-of-three, was said to be a ‘fanatical’ supporter of the country’s opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim - jailed for homosexuality just hours before the jet disappeared.
It has also been revealed that the pilot’s wife and three children moved out of the family home the day before the plane went missing.
It comes as FBI investigators say the disappearance of MH370 may have been ‘an act of piracy’ and the possibility that hundreds of passengers are being held at an unknown location has not been ruled out.
Officials also revealed that it is possible the aircraft could have landed and transmitted a satellite signal from the ground. If the plane was intact and had enough electrical power in reserve, it would be able to send out a radar ‘ping’....
Data showing the number of plausible runways where the plane could have touched down - which need to be at least 5,000ft - offer a baffling number of potential locations.

According to a map drawn up by U.S. radio station WNYC, there are 634 locations which could fit, from Australia to the Maldives to Pakistan. 
However, the true number is likely to be even higher, as estimates of how far the plane could have travelled have been increased since the calculations were carried out… 
Adding to the suspicions:

Authorities have said someone on board the plane first disabled one of its communications systems — the Aircraft and Communications Addressing and Reporting System, or ACARS — about 40 minutes after takeoff. The ACARS equipment sends information about the jet’s engines and other data to the airline.
Around 14 minutes later, the transponder that identifies the plane to commercial radar systems was also shut down. The fact that both systems went dark separately offered strong evidence that the plane’s disappearance was deliberate.
Malaysian Defence Minister Hishammuddin Hussein said last night that that the final, reassuring words from the cockpit — “All right, good night” — were spoken to air traffic controllers after the ACARS system was shut off. Whoever spoke did not mention any trouble on board. 
Air force Major General Affendi Buang told reporters he did not know whether it was the pilot or copilot who spoke to air traffic controllers.

Clive Palmer should sack his polling company

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (8:21am)

Clive Palmer, February 6:
THE federal leader of the Palmer United Party and member for Fairfax, Clive Palmer, says internal polling has found the Palmer United Party is on course to win government at the March 15 Tasmanian election. Mr Palmer said the private polling showed the Palmer United Party was expected to win 13 out of the 25 lower house seats.
Actual result at the election: no seats, 5 per cent of the vote.
Clive Palmer, September 5, 2013:
Our polling ... [is] showing that we’re about 25% across Australia. 
Actual result at the election: 5.49 per cent
Clive Palmer, September 6, 2013:
We’re looking for about 10 Senate seats across Australia. That’s what our polling is telling us...
Actual result at the election: two Senators (with WA re-run result to come.)
(Thanks to reader Peter of Bellevue Hill.) 

South Australia gets the Labor win it didn’t deserve or want

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (7:52am)

Former Labor powerbroker Graham Richardson is right - South Australia’s gerrymander is a disgrace. The Liberals’ failure to win a majority of seats on Saturday can only lead to contempt for the state’s “democracy”:
It is difficult to resist the whinges of the losers when the two-party-preferred vote is 53 per cent to 47 per cent and the party on the wrong end of that count gets more seats. 
In 2010, the Liberals achieved 18 seats on a two-party-preferred vote of 52 per cent to 48 per cent. On that occasion, three independents were elected, but even if you add those to the Liberals it still comes to only 21 seats out of 47.
The glib explanation that the Liberals have too many safe seats with big useless majorities just doesn’t cut it. Something is seriously wrong with the South Australian electoral boundaries. 
To win on Saturday, the Liberals needed in excess of 54 per cent. I can wear 51 per cent or even 52 per cent. But if you don’t win on 53 per cent or more the word gerrymander springs to mind.
The Liberals win 53 per cent of the vote after preferences and Labor draws the only conclusion - Tony Abbott is unpopular. Here’s Premier Jay Weatherill: 
...when Tony Abbott came to town it obviously reminded people of the federal dimension. So how do you weigh up these things and work out which thing made a contribution? It’s very difficult to weigh up but I’m sure it [Abbott visiting] was helpful for us. 
Today’s Nielsen poll: Abbott Government 51, Labor 49

The day Abbott became a real Prime Minister

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (7:42am)

Politics - federal

 FIVE years ago Tony Abbott became the accidental Liberal leader by one vote. Six weeks ago he finally became Prime Ministerial by two.
And here is the lesson for the Liberals — as well as for flailing Opposition Leader Bill Shorten.
You can’t cringe your way back into power, or float back on the wreckage of the boat which sank last time. And once in office you must deliver. But you also need luck — and right now it’s all with Abbott.
Abbott’s best luck was to beat Malcolm Turnbull in a leadership ballot in 2009 by just a single vote.
(Read full column here.) 

Death of the Greens

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (7:41am)

Politics - federalThe green movement

THE Greens are finished. They lost more than a third of their voters in Tasmania’s election and are everywhere in retreat.
In Saturday’s election, in the Greens’ birthplace, the party’s vote crashed from 21 per cent to 13.
Last year’s federal election was little better. The party lost 500,000 voters — more than a quarter of their support — in the Senate poll.
In the 2012 ACT election, the Greens were also hammered, losing a third of their vote. In Western Australia last year, they lost a quarter.
(Read full column here.

Union leader wants Alan Joyce shot in head. ABC goes deaf, Fairfax makes excuses

Andrew Bolt March 17 2014 (7:18am)

 The ABC yesterday failed to report one of the ugliest incidents in the ugly March in March protest - the endorsement Newcastle Trades Hall Council secretary Gary Kennedy gave to Qantas boss Alan Joyce being shot in the head.
But Fairfax’s Newcastle Herald performed the most astonishing contortions to play down what it should have condemned.
Reporter Ian Kirkwood mentioned the call for murder only deep in his story, and only to dismiss it as “perhaps surprising”. He also claimed it was atypical of the protesters - overlooking the applause protesters gave Kennedy’s call:
Newcastle Trades Hall Council secretary Gary Kennedy launched a vitriolic and pointed attack on some of what he regarded as the biggest symbols of corporate greed, describing Gina Rinehart as a ‘‘filthy animal’’ for the way she protected her wealth while calling on others to work for less, and saying Qantas chief Alan Joyce should be ‘‘shot in the back of the head’’ for proposing to sack 5000 workers to pay for his failed management strategies. 
Given recent debates over the abusive language aimed at former prime minister Julia Gillard it was perhaps surprising that Kennedy used such descriptions in a public forum, but I believe it would be a shame if they were taken as symbolising an event that was emphasised by its organisers as a ‘‘peaceful’’ protest.
In another report Kirkwood claims there was “near silence” from the crowd after Kennedy’s backing for Joyce to be shot:
The March In March rally was advertised as a peaceful protest and while Mr Kennedy’s speech was enthusiastically applauded at the end, the near silence that greeted some of his lines about Mrs Rinehart and Mr Joyce indicated that some believed he had crossed the line.
Listen to the clip above. Is the applause you hear directly after the “shot somewhere in the back of the head” line really “near silence”?
Can you imagine what the ABC and Newcastle Herald would have done had a Liberal official called a prominent female Labor supporter a “filthy animal” and called for a prominent union leader to be “shot somewhere in the back of the head”?
So why this indifference? 

Barbarians march in March. UPDATE: Crowd is told Alan Joyce should be shot in head

Andrew Bolt March 16 2014 (4:52pm)

How the Left hates

Remember the outrage, reported here by the Sydney Morning Herald?
ALAN JONES’S ill-chosen comments about the Prime Minister’s father have erupted into a commercial, political and broadcasting disaster for the talkback radio king. 
Sponsors started lining up to withdraw advertising as more than 36,000 people signed an online campaign targeting companies such as Harvey Norman, Big W and Mercedes-Benz, urging them to boycott Jones and his employer, 2GB. The deputy Prime Minister, Wayne Swan, launched an extraordinary attack on Jones, saying ... ‘’Listening to someone spray his microphone with such vitriol as you’re waking up isn’t just bad for your eardrums - it’s bad for the country ...”.
Jones quickly apologised, of course.
But who will apologise for the parade of hatred in today’s March in March?
This time the Sydney Morning Herald was present as a participant and a publicist.
The participant was the Sydney Morning Herald’s deputy editor:
The publicist was the Sydney Morning Herald columnist Clementine Ford, still selling her “F… Abbott” T-shirts:

The marchers claim to be the “voice of decency”, but speak like savages:

The marchers claim to see in Abbott a Hitler…
...but they are the menace they protest:
Cubby, having joined, is taken aback by the hatred around him:
But Sydney Morning Herald columnist Benjamin Law, a lucky arts grant recipient, is delighted:

True, for some the abuse and simulated violence is just a little joke, albeit of the kind you’d never forgive when used against, say, Gillard:
For these protesters, political discourse is conducted in the language of hatred and vilification:
I really do mean vicious hated:
And I do mean vilification:
Anne Summers used to claim that no Prime Minister was abused as was Julia Gillard:
Nor, in the case of Australia’s first female Prime Minister ....  is there the slightest drop of mercy. Or respect. 
Is mockery the new misogyny?
You tell us, Anne. Look at these signs and tell us. When did you last see such a carnival of brutal, savage, expletive-riddled political hate?
And where were Jones’ critics today? Denouncing or participating? Well, why don’t you ask  Jenna Price, of Destroy the Joint?
Perhaps worst of all, Newcastle Trades Hall Council secretary Gary Kennedy tells a March in March rally that Qantas chief Alan Joyce “should be shot somewhere in the back of the head” (from 2 mins.). Note the scary applause:

And guess what sold like hotcakes:
Back in Sydney and the “F..k Tony Abbott” Tshirts, worn by many attendees, had sold out although there were some badges left.
(Thanks to readers Elise, Jane, Jason, Jeff, another Jason, NorthernReporter and others.) 

Dreyfus has no idea. It is time Jewish leaders realised the risks and compromised

Andrew Bolt March 16 2014 (4:31pm)

Free speech

Mark Dreyfus makes an error of fact, an uninformed and dubious prediction, a false assumption and a deceptive suggestion – all in four paragraphs. Amazing work from someone who is, to my surprise, a QC:
SHADOW attorney-general Mark Dreyfus says the government is backing away from threats it made in opposition to repeal the section of the Racial Discrimination Act used to prosecute News Corp Australia columnist Andrew Bolt. 
Mr Dreyfus said the Bolt case and other decisions over the past 20 years made clear the provision was for significant cases of racial discrimination, not mere slights, and only the most serious ended up in court…

It was used to prosecute Mr Bolt over his article saying some “fair-skinned Aboriginals” chose to identify as Aboriginal for personal gain.
Mr Dreyfus said Mr Bolt failed to make out a defence of free speech and despite claims that he would appeal, he had not.
Almost nothing in those four paragraphs can be trusted. For a start, Tony Abbott has made clear he is a man of his word. Second, unless he has spoken to me Dreyfus cannot possibly know why there was no appeal – and the hint he drops like poison seems to me informed by little more than self-serving malice. There was never, to my knowledge, a promise to appeal. The final call was largely mine.
But again I ask. Jewish community leaders know well what I have done for their community. Are they happy with this outrageous attempt (one of several) to throw me under the bus simply to avoid admitting the RDA was never intended to ban the kinds of things I wrote?  Do they seriously believe my appeal to look beyond race and racial identification was racist?
As I understand it, the most prominent community leaders may now have overplayed their hand. I am looking particularly at you, Peter Wertheim. As are others.
More reasonable representatives should carefully consider two points. First, do they really want the Government’s eventual changes to be interpreted by the media and public as a green light to racists? They should not want that, the Government does not want that and I fervently don’t want that, either. Their reaction will condition that response.
Second, do they really wish to be seen as demanding restrictions on free speech largely for the benefit of their own highly articulate and influential community?  This sectarian approach to a fundamental freedom of equal value and importance to every citizen is a deeply unfortunate tactic. 
It is time some moderates took control of this debate and talked about making changes that both acknowledge a clear overreach but retain the essential protection they seek. There must be a middle way that does not involve demanding the Government break an election commitment or allowing one of the community’s most effective media supporters to be maligned and marginalised as a racist.
And that compromise should then mean that the Government, the community, free speech advocates and I can together agree: yes to free speech, no to racism. These changes should mean we can discuss things freely, even vigorously and offensively, but cannot so intimidate someone that they fear for their physical safety. To make someone fear for their safety must be where the line is drawn.
Don’t believe Dreyfus. It is time for serious people to talk seriously about a deal we can all live with. 

























Hilarious? I don't agree with the hostage taker's methods .. but killing him isn't an act of justice.


“Most illegal immigrants flooding into Australia without papers are composed of Afghani Army personnel”, an employee connected to Christmas Island has claimed.

The processing centre at Christmas Island is being manipulated by corrupt Iranian and Afghani interpreters who advise the army deserters to say they are lowly farmers.

Australian Officials, suspicious of their claims, have been jetting these dodgy detainees in their hundreds to the infamous Curtin Detention Centre in Western Australia.

The Centre, described as the “Hell Hole” is in a remote area 2,000, kilometres north of Perth.

Designed to hold 1400 of the most violent and suspect detainees, it was recently all but vacated after the disease Guillain-Barré syndrome broke out affecting locals.

In April 2010, the Rudd government decided to reopen the “horror centre” for what he termed “single male asylum seekers”, and those who fall within the category of, "do not process".

In charge of security is Serco Plc, a UK publicly listed company, the Asia-Pacific arm of which has been contracted to the Australian Government.

It has each Australian employee on signed confidentiality agreements.

Serco has usurped billions of Australian taxpayer funds, mostly wasted on renting material and white goods that could be purchased outright for the cost of one week’s rent.

Marquees and air conditioning units are ready and rented at $10,000 per week in lots of ten to cater for the expected overflow from Christmas Island.

At least three passenger airliners are chartered permanently to shuffle detainees between centres. As few as three detainees at a time are flown into the Curtin Centre, claimed one employee.

Describing their company Serco Plc said: “We provide catering, recreation, education and excursions, manage accommodation, facilities, maintenance, transport and logistics, security, training and procurement. Our employees look after thousands of people in locations all over Australia, responding to their cultural, religious and individual needs.” Mmmm.

Of most concern is the whereabouts of the 1,000 unprocessed illegal Curtin detainees who have now been dispersed to Australian cities.

“These blokes are rock-hard fit and looking for trouble”, said one Curtin employee.

Sam (not her real name) is a small part Aboriginal girl once employed by Serco.

She is too frightened to talk but an angry relative explained that Sam’s job was to escort groups of these men to Canberra and Melbourne.

They were taken to holding centres before being given bridging visas and were then dispersed into the community, legally unable to work.

After six trips Sam resigned because of the sexual abuse she suffered. Traumatised, she is now living back with her family in Derby.

Enquires from Derby to Broome, including Police stations have been met with a terse “no comment.”

“Waste is rampant”, said one local. “Tradespeople are charging up to $10 a kilometre to drive to and from the Centre to fix a washer on a tap.

"I was charging $2 a kilometre until I found out what the other guys were charging, so I put my bill in at $10 per kilometre and they never said a word, they seem to just pay whatever you invoice them for.

“If one (of the detainees) gets a toothache or anything, someone has to come out from Derby and take them back for treatment. It’s often hours waiting before they are ready to go back.”

“We are not allowed phones there”, said another ex-employee, “but I tested the phones available to the detainees and I could phone anywhere in the world.”

Another informant said that the local Derby refrigeration store, Lindsay Howard, was robbed of thousands of dollars of equipment which somehow found its way to the Curtin Centre on rental agreements. “Nothing came of it”, he said.

“It seems this Serco mob spends more time covering stuff up than doing their job here.”

So us Aussies can look forward to another tranche of thousands of Islamic Afghani army deserters soon to be scattered unprocessed throughout our communities.

Meanwhile, the Gillard Government equivocates over whether legitimate Afghani interpreters, currently risking their lives to assist our army in Afghanistan, should be allowed entry.
They are marked men once we leave.
Bloody good eh?

Asylum seekers, my arse!

I'm not US based and do not know about common core, although I would guess it is merely an attempt to take responsibility from the states and give to federal government a duplicating authority and bureaucracy. If you compare education today, as an average, with three hundred years ago, you would see vast improvement on numeracy issues. True, we might not estimate the tare weight of a horse and buggy as well, but the improvement is undeniable and shows the difference between a bureaucratic education system and a much cheaper model. I love Math and have all my life, but after I left school, I finished University part time and worked full time as a bank teller. I once wanted to compute the change of interest for a customer and realised I'd forgotten how. I was nervous about my knowledge while I was training to be a Math Teacher but teacher educators convinced me that osmosis would kick in. I taught myself because I had to both times. Education systems are broad and account for a vast range of students. I have no problems with allowing kids to progress at their own rate. Bootstrapping will still be needed tomorrow because of my attitude. I feel it is incumbent on us as educators to teach to the middle of a class and allow the high achievers to excel, while supporting the most challenged as we can.

Three cheers for Piers

Andrew BoltMARCH172013(5:44pm)

Bravo, Piers Akerman, for angrily challenging the three snickering and sneering members of the journalist collective on the set of Insiders to fight for free speech. There was some noisy spinning of wheels in reverse after that justifiably furious outburst, but too little and too late.
Journalists panting for their muzzle.
And what also disgusts me - that pack-attack and group-think mentality which makes so much of Australia’s media so intellectually lazy, complacent and incurious, and so prey to fashionable enthusiasms such as global warming. So Malcolm laughs at Piers as Karen laughs even harder, while glancing over to Barrie to check he’s laughing, too.
More on this issue in the Herald Sun tomorrow.
Reader Linda:
I just watched Insiders on TV and it occurred to me, that those journalists would be apoplectic if a Liberal Party had introduced this bill.They’re just sycophants.
Reader Seedy:
Piers showed the passion that every advocate of freedom should show. Funnily enough the 3 govt scriptwriters on the panel thought the proposed legislation was flawed yet were willing to compromise their profession. Shame on them. Well done Piers, you showed us their true colours - weak kneed apologists.
Reader Bile:
Piers was inspirational this morning on the Insiders. He tore in the other 3 clowns for their laughing. What, are they too dumb to realize what Conroy’s legislation will mean to them? Or are they too much in Labor’s pocket to protest against the attack on their freedom (of the press). Let us all be inspired by Piers’ deeds and be as strong in condemning Conroy’s legislation.
Reader Lee:
Even knowing of the predominantly left-leaning bias of the Insiders guests (plus host), I was appalled at the sniggering, sarcastic interruptions to the legitimate opinion put forward by Piers Akerman. Barrie Cassidy, Karen Middleton and Malcolm Farr, being journalists, should hang their heads in shame at their brazen attempts to muzzle and denigrate other points of view. An unfortunate new low for the taxpayer-funded ABC, but perhaps a reflection of the presenters’ recognition of the chaos that is the Gillard Government.
Reader Lisle:
What does one say when you see such an inspirational performance from Piers on Insiders this morning? It just illustrates how naive and laid back Australians have become to believe that this attack on our freedom of speech is okay. It is not, and all just to get News Limited because they have highlighted the failings of this government. I didn’t notice their shouting in 2007 when the media backed Kevin Rudd.My sister commented to me yesterday that it reminds her of Chifley’s intention to nationalise the banks in 1949.Let us all be inspired by Piers.

Reader Liz:
It was a shocker! And then Farr says at the end of the programme congratulations to Barrie Cassidy about some award he had won.Another award for the groupthink set.
Reader Peter of Bellevue Hill: 
AB, I think Farr has the most to answer for: after all, the proposed print media reforms don’t touch the the other two. While Barrie and Karen should have to wear the shame of their efforts this morning forevermore, Farr should retire immediately. If he’s so lost to the Left that he can’t bring himself to defend his own freedom, then clearly the time has come for him to give the game away. 
Another Insiders panellist begs for a muzzle: 
But what Mike Seccombe also does is: 
A: misrepresent Piers’ argument, thereby committing the sin he claims we need new laws to stop.
B: suggest this really is the Gillard Government using state power to attack a single media group, a misuses of state power to which he does not object.
You wonder why some cultured countries, or at least their elites, once permitted a slide into totalitarianism, or, indeed, actually cheered it on.
No, this isn’t a totalitarian country. But the first lurches towards a control of the free press are meeting an astonishing lack of resistance from those who should care most.
Yet another journalist calling for the muzzle: 
What a gross misrepresentation of what Piers, said, with free slander thrown in.
But where is Bongiorno’s own accountability? What will it take for him to finally correct and apologise for this astonishing misrepresentation he perpetrated on ABC Radio National’sBreakfast?:
Of course we do know [Tony Abbott] stoutly defended [immigration spokesman] Scott Morrison, who thought that asylum seekers who are on bridging visas should be tagged the same way as sex offenders.
As I pointed out at the time: 
Morrison said or suggested no such thing. The closest anyone in the Opposition came to saying anything of the kind was Opposition frontbencher Eric Abetz - who actually rejected a suggestion, put to him by a journalist, that asylum seekers be put on a register like sex offenders. No mention of tagging at all.

Bongiorno has ascribed to Morrison a view not expressed by him or any other Liberal, and done so on the basis of a misquote of someone else.
Bongiorno never corrected, never apologised. Should a new (Liberal-appointed) media supercop force him to?
Professor Sinclair Davidson:
Reader Ringo: 
Andrew, for further stupidity, see Farr’s ridiculous tweeting after the show in which he completely twists what Piers was actually saying. And yes, cheered on by the usual subjects.
(Thanks to reader Andy.)

Trashing the joint

Miranda Devine – Sunday, March 17, 2013 (4:09am)

THE great and the good of the Liberal Party turned out on Friday to a packed breakfast for the purposeful member for the blue-ribbon Melbourne seat of Kooyong, Josh Frydenberg.
Christopher Pyne, George Brandis, Nick Greiner, Michael Kroger, Richard Alston and the Kemp brothers Rod and David, were there to support the 41-year old dynamo.
Much chat was about the latest Spectator magazine, with its arresting cover image of the Prime Minister on the cross, titled “Julia the martyr”.
But it was Peter Coleman’s newsy column which, as always, was the subject of liveliest discussion. Mark Latham’s launch of his Quarterly Essay at North Sydney’s Stanton Library last week was “like an episode of Q&A but with more mummy bloggers and pensioners”, wrote Coleman.
The love fest was interrupted, however, when Spectator editor Tom Switzer asked Latham why, if Julia Gillard was such a warrior against misogyny, she did not protest when he attacked columnist Janet Albrechtsen in parliament as a “skanky ho”. Good question.
Coleman reports that Latham shouted: “Everyone knows you are besotted with her!” and then declared his only regret was that he apologised.
Former Howard minister Neil Brown couldn’t resist pointing out his own droll column in the same edition of the magazine, poking fun at Malcolm Turnbull’s modelling gig in GQ: “I am pretty sure that Gucci pocket squares at $225 do not go down well on parma night at the Rooty Hill RSL.”
After poached eggs, a panel discussion dealt with more weighty topics, such as Stephen “Stalin” Conroy’s new media regulations, viewed, unsurprisingly, by those in the room as the latest proof of the Gillard government’s determination to punish its enemies and reward its friends in a mad rush before September’s election.
It was Brandis who provided a metaphor with Spectator-like sparkle.
He recounted the story of Wayne Swan’s vandalised electorate office and car in 1996 after Swan lost his Brisbane seat of Lilley.
“An extreme state of disarray”, was how Administrative Services Minister David Jull had described it in Parliament, itemising $6000 in damages. Swan strenuously denied the claims at the time, and threatened legal action, but the mystery of who trashed his office remains.
Nevertheless, Brandis took the fate of the office as a symbol for the government’s current behaviour, trashing the joint before it walks out the door.
Golden Tara of Butuan
“Therefore, as God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience.” - Colossians 3:12
Morning and Evening by Charles Spurgeon

March 16: Morning
"I am a stranger with thee." - Psalm 39:12
Yes, O Lord, with thee, but not to thee. All my natural alienation from thee, thy grace has effectually removed; and now, in fellowship with thyself, I walk through this sinful world as a pilgrim in a foreign country. Thou art a stranger in thine own world. Man forgets thee, dishonours thee, sets up new laws and alien customs, and knows thee not. When thy dear Son came unto his own, his own received him not. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. Never was foreigner so speckled a bird among the denizens of any land as thy beloved Son among his mother's brethren. It is no marvel, then, if I who live the life of Jesus, should be unknown and a stranger here below. Lord, I would not be a citizen where Jesus was an alien. His pierced hand has loosened the cords which once bound my soul to earth, and now I find myself a stranger in the land. My speech seems to these Babylonians among whom I dwell an outlandish tongue, my manners are singular, and my actions are strange. A Tartar would be more at home in Cheapside than I could ever be in the haunts of sinners. But here is the sweetness of my lot: I am a stranger with thee. Thou art my fellow-sufferer, my fellow-pilgrim. Oh, what joy to wander in such blessed society! My heart burns within me by the way when thou dost speak to me, and though I be a sojourner, I am far more blest than those who sit on thrones, and far more at home than those who dwell in their ceiled houses.

"To me remains nor place, nor time:
My country is in every clime;
I can be calm and free from care
On any shore, since God is there.
While place we seek, or place we shun,
The soul finds happiness in none:
But with a God to guide our way,
'Tis equal joy to go or stay."
"Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins." - Psalm 19:13
Such was the prayer of the "man after God's own heart." Did holy David need to pray thus? How needful, then, must such a prayer be for us babes in grace! It is as if he said, "Keep me back, or I shall rush headlong over the precipice of sin." Our evil nature, like an ill-tempered horse, is apt to run away. May the grace of God put the bridle upon it, and hold it in, that it rush not into mischief. What might not the best of us do if it were not for the checks which the Lord sets upon us both in providence and in grace! The psalmist's prayer is directed against the worst form of sin--that which is done with deliberation and wilfulness. Even the holiest need to be "kept back" from the vilest transgressions. It is a solemn thing to find the apostle Paul warning saints against the most loathsome sins. "Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry." What! do saints want warning against such sins as these? Yes, they do. The whitest robes, unless their purity be preserved by divine grace, will be defiled by the blackest spots. Experienced Christian, boast not in your experience; you will trip yet if you look away from him who is able to keep you from falling. Ye whose love is fervent, whose faith is constant, whose hopes are bright, say not, "We shall never sin," but rather cry, "Lead us not into temptation." There is enough tinder in the heart of the best of men to light a fire that shall burn to the lowest hell, unless God shall quench the sparks as they fall. Who would have dreamed that righteous Lot could be found drunken, and committing uncleanness? Hazael said, "Is thy servant a dog, that he should do this thing?" and we are very apt to use the same self-righteous question. May infinite wisdom cure us of the madness of self-confidence.
[Văsh'nī] - god is strong.
First-born of Samuel the prophet (1 Chron. 6:28). The prophet's oldest son is also named as Joel (1 Sam. 8:2).

Today's reading: Deuteronomy 28-29, Mark 14:54-72 (NIV)

View today's reading on Bible Gateway

Today's Old Testament reading: Deuteronomy 25-27

Blessings for Obedience
1 If you fully obey the LORD your God and carefully follow all his commands I give you today, the LORD your God will set you high above all the nations on earth. 2 All these blessings will come on you and accompany you if you obey the LORD your God:
3 You will be blessed in the city and blessed in the country.
4 The fruit of your womb will be blessed, and the crops of your land and the young of your livestock--the calves of your herds and the lambs of your flocks....

Today's New Testament reading: Mark 14:27-53

54 Peter followed him at a distance, right into the courtyard of the high priest. There he sat with the guards and warmed himself at the fire.
55 The chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin were looking for evidence against Jesus so that they could put him to death, but they did not find any. 56 Many testified falsely against him, but their statements did not agree.
57 Then some stood up and gave this false testimony against him: 58 "We heard him say, 'I will destroy this temple made with human hands and in three days will build another, not made with hands.'" 59 Yet even then their testimony did not agree....
Today's Prayer

Lord Jesus Christ, who commanded us to love our enemies and all those who insult and hurt us, and to pray for them and forgive them; you yourself prayed for your enemies, who crucified you. Give us, we pray, a spirit of Christian reconciliation and meekness, so that we may forgive every injury and be reconciled with our enemies. Grant us Christian meekness and true love of our neighbor. Give to our enemies true peace and forgiveness of sins; and do not allow them to leave this life without true faith and sincere conversion. Help us to repay evil with goodness. -- adapted from the Orthodox "Prayer for Enemies"

Today's Scripture Reading: Psalm 25:3-9

3 No one who hopes in you
will ever be put to shame,
but shame will come on those
who are treacherous without cause.
4 Show me your ways, LORD,
teach me your paths.
5 Guide me in your truth and teach me,
for you are God my Savior,
and my hope is in you all day long.
6 Remember, LORD, your great mercy and love,
for they are from of old.
7 Do not remember the sins of my youth
and my rebellious ways;
according to your love remember me,
for you, LORD, are good.
8 Good and upright is the LORD;
therefore he instructs sinners in his ways.
9 He guides the humble in what is right
and teaches them his way.
Today's Quote

Today's quote is from the famous Easter hymn "Ah, Holy Jesus, How Hast Thou Offended," a powerful reflection on our own guilt and role in Jesus' crucifixion. You can learn more about this hymn at the Center for Church Music.

Ah, holy Jesus, how hast Thou offended,
That man to judge Thee hath in hate pretended?
By foes derided, by Thine own rejected,
O most afflicted.

Who was the guilty--Who brought this upon Thee?
Alas, my treason, Jesus, hath undone Thee.
'Twas I, Lord, Jesus, I it was denied Thee!
I crucified Thee.

For me, kind Jesus, was Thine incarnation,
Thy mortal sorrow, and Thy life's oblation;
Thy death of anguish and Thy bitter passion,
For my salvation.

Therefore, kind Jesus, since I cannot pay Thee,
I do adore Thee, and will ever pray Thee,
Think on Thy pity and Thy love unswerving,
Not my deserving.

Something to Think About

Forgiveness is an integral part of the Easter story. Who in your life needs to be forgiven today? Who do you need to ask for forgiveness? This week, consider extending the hand of forgiveness to somebody who needs it.

Today's Lent reading: Matthew 17-18 (NIV)

View today's Lent reading on Bible Gateway
The Transfiguration
After six days Jesus took with him Peter, James and John the brother of James, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. 2 There he was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light. 3 Just then there appeared before them Moses and Elijah, talking with Jesus.
4 Peter said to Jesus, "Lord, it is good for us to be here. If you wish, I will put up three shelters--one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah."
5 While he was still speaking, a bright cloud covered them, and a voice from the cloud said, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. Listen to him!"

Post a Comment