He seems confused

Stephen Wilson

Geez I love owning leftist puppets.

Like ·  · Share · Stop Notifications · 20 December at 21:53

• Phil Box, Meryll Cattach, Lee Springett and 57 others like this.
• 

  John Barber Some of them, really. It's like shooting fish in a barrel.
  
  Hypocritical, self righteous, end-justifies-the-means fish, but fish in a barrel, nonetheless.

  20 December at 21:58 · Edited · Like · 4
• 

  Roger Corby Well done Stephen

  20 December at 22:04 via mobile · Like · 5
• 

  Anne Smiles Great stuff Stephen.... Well written and Oh So True. 

  20 December at 22:06 · Like · 8
• 

  Jen Graham And did you silence him?

  20 December at 22:15 · Like
• 

  Stephen Wilson well, he hasn't replied, but he is a friend of another friend on FB, but he will no doubt return with some lame irrelevant comment.

  20 December at 22:18 · Like · 7
• 

  Steve Zironda Stephen, if you're not a barrister - you bloody well should be. Well said. And as for the 'will of the people' that your opponent espouses? I think the loss of 17 Labor Senate seats speaks volumes about 'mandates'. John Barrie doesn't need any turkey this Christmas, or ham for that matter. He is a goose of the first order. 

  20 December at 22:31 · Like · 8
• 

  Gordon Freeman Fantastic! Knowledge is something severely lacking in the lefties.

  20 December at 22:38 · Like · 5
• 

  Karin Berryman Steve, while you were at it you should have thrown in; 'Did the people vote for Gillard?' too.

  20 December at 23:16 · Like · 3
• 

  Vivienne Smith I think Mr Barrie doesn't understand the meaning of the word "mandate", but then, if you take your English lessons from Gillard, then it's excusable. Gillard governed against the mandate the country clearly gave both parties (no Carbon Tax).
  
  Then she went on to prove that she has no idea as to the definition of the word "semantics", or perhaps it's the word "not" she has a problem with...?
  
  "It's not a Carbon Tax; it's a price on carbon"
  
  "I'm not going to get into a game of semantics about it...."
  
  Ummmmm yes... calling a Carbon Tax a price on carbon and trying to convince people it's not the same thing...yes... that IS playing a game of semantics (and losing!).
  
  And let's not get started on her definition of the word "misogyny"!

  Yesterday at 01:57 · Like · 3
• 

  Vivienne Smith PS. Well done Stephen Wilson

  Yesterday at 01:58 · Like · 1
• 

  Drew P Drawz Articulated and eloquent, Stephen. Well spoke ... and CORRECT!

  Yesterday at 02:27 · Like · 1
• 

  Jason Ransome Awesome! Loved it! Big fan of your work = )

  Yesterday at 03:28 · Like · 2
• 

  Ruth Beardsley I call them WELTs: Western Elite Leftist Tyrants.

  Yesterday at 05:12 · Like · 2
• 

  Sam McKell Well Done

  Yesterday at 06:38 · Like
• 

  Annie Ozard Good job Stephen

  Yesterday at 07:00 · Like
• 

  Jan Stringer Well done!

  Yesterday at 08:10 · Like
• 

  Stephen Wilson Oh, incredibly, he did respond....with this pearl of ...errr...wisdom:

  

  Yesterday at 08:53 · Like · 9
• 

  Steven Smith Logic is a bastard isn't it.

  Yesterday at 12:08 via mobile · Like · 2
• 

  Peter Needham He has nothing and he knows it. Its just argument for the sake of saving face(book) lol..

  Yesterday at 13:46 · Like · 4
• 

  Lori Dawn Cartagena Brilliant! Well written,Stephen. Bravo!

  Yesterday at 19:25 · Like · 1
• 

  David Daniel Ball .. do you have to agree with Keating?

  10 hours ago · Like
• 

  Stephen Wilson In that instance, yes.

  10 hours ago · Like
• 

  David Daniel Ball .. maybe you should stick to financial planning then. I get the broad gist of what you have written, but must point out that you haven't argued well. And that means you strengthen your opponent's case. It might be satisfying to abuse and belittle them, but you give too much away in ding so. They are wrong, and you are right. If you begin attacking third parties you show yourself to be isolated. It is better to be like Steve Waugh and win every game than to be like Mark Taylor and merely be better than them. The Steve Waugh approach would be to say people were hurt before by lies told by the ALP and will be again. It is important for the ALP to change. To say you agree with a self indulgent, bitter incompetent and hate their supporters shows character flaws.

  10 hours ago · Like
• 

  Lyn Talbot Well, I think you did a great job, Stephen!

  9 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1
• 

  Stephen Wilson Thank you Lyn, I appreciate the positive comments from everyone. 

Bill Shorten will NEVER be Prime Minister

Holden workers still have their jobs, and will continue in them until the doors shut in 2017, being paid well above award wages, yet they and their union are screaming at the injustice of them losing their jobs.

Many, if not all, Holden workers will receive over-generous redundancy packages that will see them surviv...See more

Like ·  · Share · Stop Notifications · 9 hours ago

• 16 people like this.
• 

  Selina H Davies Shorten is a moron. Pathetic left wing cretin that is just a bloody nuisance.

  9 hours ago via mobile · Like · 7
• 

  Anthony Broome The Union is pissed because it will lose millions in funding forced out of these workers! However, with 4 years notice and huge redundancy payouts, taxed at very marginal rates these guys have won the lottery. No more bullshit from the Labor/Union criminal movement!

  9 hours ago via mobile · Like · 4
• 

  Stephen Wilson To me, Bill Shorten just looks completely disinterested as opposition PM.

  5 hours ago · Like · 2
• 

  Greg Baxter People get retrenched everyday. Myself 3 times in 27 years in the workforce. Didn't get a brass Razoo other than what I was owed in holiday pay. Why are these sacred cows more important than Jo blow down road. Beyond me.

  3 hours ago via mobile · Like · 2
• 

  David Daniel Ball Stephen Wilson, technically, you mean uninterested .. he is disinterested in anything worthwhile ..

  2 hours ago · Like
• 

  Stephen Wilson No David, I mean disinterested. Kindly stop trying to pick apart my posts.

  about an hour ago · Edited · Like
• 

  Stephen Wilson Is there a reason you have critiqued me twice in 24 hours and yet no-one else has come under your watchful gaze? Are you attempting to diminish and dismiss my contributions?

  2 hours ago · Edited · Like
• 

  David Daniel Ball .. three times .. or you missed my pinned post .. there is an adage about those saying what they mean only if they mean what they say. The word disinterested suggests a good thing about Shorten, akin to impartial. Is there a reason you have such animosity to being corrected? Would you prefer I were oppositional? Why?

  2 hours ago · Like
• 

  Stephen Wilson No, I'd prefer you didn't respond to me at all. I know what I mean, do not pre-suppose that you do. Shorten TO ME looks disinterested in his role.

  2 hours ago · Like
• 

  David Daniel Ball I get it. I'm being helpful, but it isn't really helpful because you just don't get it.

  about an hour ago · Like
• 

  Pete Jasper Unions use to run the country under the previous government so they can not recognize the reality of that they have priced their workers out of work. Job well done!

  about an hour ago · Like · 2
• 

  Stephen Wilson No David, you do not get it. I know what I mean. Just for your clarification, I'll take any number of the following synonyms for 'disinterested' to support my reasoning for using it (aloof, dispassionate, not giving a damn etc). If you believe that I meant to use only a completely negative adjective, then you are 100% wrong.

  

  about an hour ago · Edited · Like
• 

  Stephen Wilson It is the height of arrogance that you presume to know what I feel about Shorten's performance and attitude in his role as opposition PM, not to mention that you believe Shorten is not interested in anything worthwhile. We can criticise all we like, but none of them are inhuman and without conscience or forethought.

===
Stephen Wilson, posts his 'thoughts' but hasn't *really* thought about them .. and doesn't want to be understood. He is just proud to post his .. *thoughts*